POLL: Want active mine placement in SVN edit mode?

Should active mines be placable in maps from offline edit mode?

Poll ended at 26 Mar 2013, 00:28

Yes, active mines should savable in maps from offline edit mode.
3
33%
Yes, but I think we should be able to place active mines in online edit mode as well.
2
22%
No, active mines should not be savable in maps from offline or online edit mode.
3
33%
I have another opinion and will post about it.
1
11%
 
Total votes : 9

POLL: Want active mine placement in SVN edit mode?

Postby Dratz-_C » 05 Mar 2013, 00:28

Hi folks,
This post will only make sense if you have recently used the new weapon, mines, present in the SVN. According to the response to my limited questioning in the game and on the forum I have determined that there is an interest beyond my own in being able to place activated mines in edit mode that would carry over into the game. I had only originally envisioned this idea for offline edit mode, but there is a possibility that it could be fun from online edit mode as well. Here are some play scenarios for edit mode activated mines. I am not the best at scenarios so please bear with me. Preplacing active mine primaries, proximity charges, could be used to slow people down in timetrial while requiring that they hit or be hit by the mines before passing an area. The mine secondary, 'laser activated charge' could be used to create nonlinear paths through timetrial maps where a player would be given an opportunity to go behind a mine and shoot it through a conduit from the side to allow passage through the area previously blocked by the laser from the mine. Some poeple like to create laser art with the mine secondary; this art could now be generated with a savable outcome in a map. Perhaps over the next couple of weeks we can discover if this idea is good or bad. To make it easy to convey our opinions I have created a poll that will last 21 days.
Cheers
User avatar
Dratz-_C
 
Posts: 409
Joined: 03 Mar 2012, 00:13
Location: North Carolina, United States of America

Re: POLL: Want active mine placement in SVN edit mode?

Postby raiden » 05 Mar 2013, 11:53

The time trial mode was also the first thing which came to my mind while reading your first lines. It should be not to hard to cross such "lazerzones" though, - to give beginners a chance. All in all your idea sounds good to me.
sorn
cutec
syndicate
metalhead

ingame: .uEn|r4iden
User avatar
raiden
 
Posts: 331
Joined: 23 Jan 2012, 12:59
Location: Berlin, Germany

Re: POLL: Want active mine placement in SVN edit mode?

Postby restcoser » 05 Mar 2013, 12:38

You could just shoot the mines I guess?
Would be nice for time-trial and gauntlet, and as an alternate to deathzones.
However, as I already stated, I'd like a more general weapon-shooter entitiy
restcoser
 
Posts: 65
Joined: 03 Jul 2012, 11:25

Re: POLL: Want active mine placement in SVN edit mode?

Postby qreeves » 05 Mar 2013, 15:24

restcoser {l Wrote}:You could just shoot the mines I guess?
Would be nice for time-trial and gauntlet, and as an alternate to deathzones.
However, as I already stated, I'd like a more general weapon-shooter entitiy

Yeah, see, that's a much better idea in the long run.
Quinton "quin" Reeves | Lead Developer, Red Eclipse | http://redeclipse.net/ | http://www.facebook.com/redeclipse.net
User avatar
qreeves
 
Posts: 1294
Joined: 17 Mar 2011, 03:46
Location: Queensland, Australia

Re: POLL: Want active mine placement in SVN edit mode?

Postby LuckyStrike-Rx » 05 Mar 2013, 21:56

restcoser {l Wrote}:However, as I already stated, I'd like a more general weapon-shooter entitiy

Turret does that already to perfection.
Image
User avatar
LuckyStrike-Rx
 
Posts: 183
Joined: 21 Mar 2011, 14:07

Re: POLL: Want active mine placement in SVN edit mode?

Postby raiden » 05 Mar 2013, 22:33

I would prefer this ability in offline editmode only. I know that playing around with that could be fun online too, but this may harm or disturb editors who try to have a serious editing session. ... I don't know, other opinions might update me :).
sorn
cutec
syndicate
metalhead

ingame: .uEn|r4iden
User avatar
raiden
 
Posts: 331
Joined: 23 Jan 2012, 12:59
Location: Berlin, Germany

Re: POLL: Want active mine placement in SVN edit mode?

Postby Sniper-Goth » 05 Mar 2013, 22:37

LuckyStrike-Rx {l Wrote}:
restcoser {l Wrote}:However, as I already stated, I'd like a more general weapon-shooter entitiy

Turret does that already to perfection.


Yes but the turret is only avaiable when playing in Onslaught.
The objective of a shooter entity is to create a trap for the players in the levels, like some of the Quake 1 levels where theres a wall shooting, and you have to pass through it.
Walked through a room that doesnt seem to want to hurt you, to then press the switch button, open a door somewhere, and after that the walls open and there are things shooting, that you need to calculate the time to pass through it.
We could have a great variety in terms of time trial/general level design don't you think?
Red Eclipse in game name: Sniper-Goth/Sniper-quake3. Maps in the making: DOTA style map, ringed, train, ladder race,.
User avatar
Sniper-Goth
 
Posts: 221
Joined: 27 Aug 2012, 20:10

Re: POLL: Want active mine placement in SVN edit mode?

Postby Evropi » 05 Mar 2013, 23:20

I don't think mines should carry over.

They create the need for familiarity with maps. Moreover, the mines won't respawn (or it would be terrible if they did, the last thing you want for your game is deaths that are not the player's fault) so I bet everyone will just shoot them if they have to (or not, I find sniping grenades quite fun when I'm bored). They will be unpredictable the first time and you'll know where they are the next time. Also, if mines were not allowed by default on maps, it gives us an opportunity to bump the damage they cause a bit, whilst maintaining balance.

As for time trials, there usually is just one way to cross a time trial obstacle in most maps. Otherwise you die and respawn. Allowing mines to enter time trial would also greatly reduce the replayability of time trial maps, as experienced players would know where all the mines are so they can take them out in advance. Noobs would feel unfairly treated. Experienced players would feel like they have to perform a chore. All obstacles like the lasers should be fixed and non-removable, or people who knew all the tricks of the map would have the upper hand.
You just wasted 3 seconds of your life reading this.
User avatar
Evropi
 
Posts: 385
Joined: 02 Sep 2012, 16:18

Re: POLL: Want active mine placement in SVN edit mode?

Postby restcoser » 05 Mar 2013, 23:38

Imho, the mines should respawn, maybe just on trigger, but they should, else they become useless, as one mine is destroyed fairly quickly.
(As for non-player caused deaths, we already have death and lava material, i don't see that being bad)
Also, knowing the map is and should always be an advantage. Knowing where you can get weapons, where you can wallrun efficently, what tricks you can do on a map is highly dependant on map knowledge. It gives the player a feeling of progression, of power that he might have over other players, as that is the very essence of an egoshooter, you (most likely) want to be better than everyone else.
What I'm also not that sure about is the use in time trial maps. It is an alternate to an instant death, but probably it is better to kill the player immediatly in time trial than catching him in the air and killing him there (mine2). That will make your time worse and can easily annoy you, as dying is common in time trial.
As I said I think that mines would respawn, so i think that taking out dangers ahead would not work completly. (maybe you could also set mines to immortal?)
restcoser
 
Posts: 65
Joined: 03 Jul 2012, 11:25

Re: POLL: Want active mine placement in SVN edit mode?

Postby LuckyStrike-Rx » 06 Mar 2013, 00:02

Sniper-Goth {l Wrote}:We could have a great variety in terms of time trial/general level design don't you think?

I would love more triggerable actions indeed. Breakable map-model in the first place.
Image
User avatar
LuckyStrike-Rx
 
Posts: 183
Joined: 21 Mar 2011, 14:07

Re: POLL: Want active mine placement in SVN edit mode?

Postby qreeves » 06 Mar 2013, 09:11

LuckyStrike-Rx {l Wrote}:
Sniper-Goth {l Wrote}:We could have a great variety in terms of time trial/general level design don't you think?

I would love more triggerable actions indeed. Breakable map-model in the first place.

I'm getting there slowly :-P
Quinton "quin" Reeves | Lead Developer, Red Eclipse | http://redeclipse.net/ | http://www.facebook.com/redeclipse.net
User avatar
qreeves
 
Posts: 1294
Joined: 17 Mar 2011, 03:46
Location: Queensland, Australia

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests