What do we want in RE?

What do we want in RE?

Postby hamolton » 10 Feb 2012, 03:43

Some video game artist at http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/p ... rtist_ama/ is willing to help out with RE. What do we want?
"Small graphical suggestions" thread: viewtopic.php?f=53&t=2674
hamolton
 
Posts: 7
Joined: 26 Nov 2011, 23:52

Re: What do we want in RE?

Postby inpersona64 » 10 Feb 2012, 05:20

I'm not sure what I want to see but I know in a thread a while back, we were all thinking about a new weapon(s) for Red Eclipse. And so I'm going to upload a video tomorrow talking about what weapons we already have and what there is to add. Because most of the weapons already cover all the possibilities of "attack" in RE. Anyway, that's what I want to see, new weapon ideas.
User avatar
inpersona64
 
Posts: 474
Joined: 01 Apr 2011, 18:19
Location: Eastern USA

Re: What do we want in RE?

Postby Vaecrius » 10 Feb 2012, 07:33

New shotgun model.
User avatar
Vaecrius
 
Posts: 46
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 10:01

Re: What do we want in RE?

Postby arand » 10 Feb 2012, 13:55

viewtopic.php?f=53&t=2244 is quite relevant ;)
User avatar
arand
 
Posts: 211
Joined: 26 Mar 2011, 21:42

Re: What do we want in RE?

Postby fawstoar » 10 Feb 2012, 16:29

ASIDE from weapon models & animation, which RE needs desperately, I would be interested in the possibility of smaller graphical tweaks like depth of field and some better lighting. Could really make the game look better, IMO.

If anyone's played the latest Deus Ex, RE could definitely take some design cues from that game, which uses some really strong filters and lighting effects to hide the low-resolution textures and less visually appealing parts of the game's environments.

To see how this could benefit RE, compare Delicatessen or Linear - which both feature some of the aforementioned qualities - to Forge or Echo, which are somewhat lackluster. DoF or other effects could make RE's maps much more contemporary.
-Wasabi
Map flythroughs, RE trailers, etc: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL67578B2BCD99FB7B
User avatar
fawstoar
 
Posts: 218
Joined: 27 Mar 2011, 20:53
Location: Canada, ideally.

Re: What do we want in RE?

Postby Vaecrius » 10 Feb 2012, 18:30

...except that I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one who thinks Forge and Echo are two of the better-looking maps and Linear is one of the worse.
User avatar
Vaecrius
 
Posts: 46
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 10:01

Re: What do we want in RE?

Postby fawstoar » 10 Feb 2012, 19:06

Forge looks pretty good, maybe facility is a better example. Linear looks pretty good with the settings turned up, certainly better than echo. But I'm trying to analyze the quality of lighting and filters on these maps, not necessarily their architecture. Linear looks decent pretty much just because of its shineys, something that echo could seriously benefit from - it's currently really bland and lifeless.
-Wasabi
Map flythroughs, RE trailers, etc: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL67578B2BCD99FB7B
User avatar
fawstoar
 
Posts: 218
Joined: 27 Mar 2011, 20:53
Location: Canada, ideally.

Re: What do we want in RE?

Postby inpersona64 » 10 Feb 2012, 20:11

See, but this is where you have to remember, a majority of us downloaded Red Eclipse because (1 we don't have PCs that can produce heavy 3D graphics and complex textures and (2 Red Eclipse runs well on low resources and isn't demanding. Increasing dynamic settings in game could mean lower fps for those who can hardly play as it is. I think as far as performance goes, Red Eclipse is on point, visually. Regarding the maps, I really only like Echo because it's a great small DM map for anything between FFAs to 4v4s. It's also very appealing to me, but of course that's just a personal taste.
User avatar
inpersona64
 
Posts: 474
Joined: 01 Apr 2011, 18:19
Location: Eastern USA

Re: What do we want in RE?

Postby Vaecrius » 11 Feb 2012, 08:25

I beg to differ - Echo actually looks and feels something like a real (if somewhat arbitrarily designed) place.

Seconding inpersona64 in any event. Me, I can run everything at max just fine now* but about five months ago I kept feeling like the FPS world was just passing me by. D: Accessibility is important esp. for a f/Free game.

*My opinion of Linear is based on this
User avatar
Vaecrius
 
Posts: 46
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 10:01

Re: What do we want in RE?

Postby GooshGoosh! » 17 Feb 2012, 20:13

fawstoar {l Wrote}:ASIDE from weapon models & animation, which RE needs desperately, I would be interested in the possibility of smaller graphical tweaks like depth of field and some better lighting. Could really make the game look better, IMO.

If anyone's played the latest Deus Ex, RE could definitely take some design cues from that game, which uses some really strong filters and lighting effects to hide the low-resolution textures and less visually appealing parts of the game's environments.

To see how this could benefit RE, compare Delicatessen or Linear - which both feature some of the aforementioned qualities - to Forge or Echo, which are somewhat lackluster. DoF or other effects could make RE's maps much more contemporary.


I agree with you.
I made a list for some graphical improvement that RE can use for better eye appeal:
Doom3 shaders (id Tech 4 shaders, they good for metallic materials)
Shadow Volumes (Like in Doom3)
Per-Pixel Motion Blur (like in Crysis)
HDR
DoF (Depth of Field)
and SSAO (Space-Screen Ambient Occlusion, not really necessary)
Bullet Physics Engine (Not a graphical improvement, but can be used for destructible environments)

Of course all these options require a lot of work, but I hope that will be possible for RE! :)

P.S.:
id Tech 4 is open-source now, so it is possible to "grab" the shaders and lighting calculation and "add" them to Cube 2 Engine?
User avatar
GooshGoosh!
 
Posts: 49
Joined: 30 Jul 2011, 16:01

Re: What do we want in RE?

Postby Vaecrius » 18 Feb 2012, 09:24

As someone whose computer can easily run all that without a hitch, I would rather that we didn't have all that gimmicky crap (besides destructible environments!) before we had a good reason to include it - a game never, ever looks better with better tech but not better art.

Some of the stuff here (e.g., rim-lighting) is useful now because it is directly connected to gameplay, but HDR and motion blur are not only useless but hurt the fast, dance-and-duel fighting style of RE gameplay - make opponents too hard to see and your instagib matches turn into a "realistic" cat-and-mouse.
User avatar
Vaecrius
 
Posts: 46
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 10:01

Re: What do we want in RE?

Postby GooshGoosh! » 18 Feb 2012, 10:29

My PC can run all that "gimmicky crap".
User avatar
GooshGoosh!
 
Posts: 49
Joined: 30 Jul 2011, 16:01

Re: What do we want in RE?

Postby Ulukai » 18 Feb 2012, 11:21

I don't think it would hurt to include better graphics like shadow volumes and the like, it could be an option that players with lower hardware can disable. However, Cube 2 engine is a 1 or 2 man project and this would ask a lot of work. RE graphics are quite pretty and fun to look at atm with all options turned on imo, so it might be beneficial but not necessary.
User avatar
Ulukai
 
Posts: 741
Joined: 19 Mar 2011, 10:55
Location: Mechelen, Belgium

Re: What do we want in RE?

Postby hulk » 18 Feb 2012, 13:42

Better Weapon ANIMATIONS...
"Red Eclipse pwns Sauerbraten. Deal with it." - hulk
"low FOVs make me sick" - hulk

nickname RE: PENiS
hulk
 
Posts: 61
Joined: 17 Jan 2012, 00:16

Re: What do we want in RE?

Postby hamolton » 29 Feb 2012, 04:36

He says to contact him at https://twitter.com/#!/Stabberthomas
Did quin get that?
hamolton
 
Posts: 7
Joined: 26 Nov 2011, 23:52

Re: What do we want in RE?

Postby 012yArthur0 » 29 Feb 2012, 18:15

1. Better Weapons visual. The pistol just outclasses the shotgun
2. A more balanced weapon system
3. Fix the kicks
4. Add the Super Jump again?
5. Fix the bugs/glitches. (Aside of qweer locking my topic, today I just witnessed my opponents being invisible)
6. Video Recording Command
7. Maybe a "Lite" version for people that has bad PC.
012yArthur0
 
Posts: 14
Joined: 03 Feb 2012, 02:27

Re: What do we want in RE?

Postby TheLastProject » 29 Feb 2012, 20:06

012yArthur0 {l Wrote}:1. Better Weapons visual. The pistol just outclasses the shotgun

Agreed.
012yArthur0 {l Wrote}:2. A more balanced weapon system

What's unbalanced about the current one?
012yArthur0 {l Wrote}:3. Fix the kicks

They're not broken, you need to dash before kicking to prevent holding Q from getting you random kicks
012yArthur0 {l Wrote}:4. Add the Super Jump again?

Meh, don't think it's that interesting.
012yArthur0 {l Wrote}:5. Fix the bugs/glitches. (Aside of qweer locking my topic, today I just witnessed my opponents being invisible)

If it's not in the bugtracker it's not a bug.
012yArthur0 {l Wrote}:6. Video Recording Command

/movie already exists
012yArthur0 {l Wrote}:7. Maybe a "Lite" version for people that has bad PC.

That's called "putting all settings on lowest".
Hats, Afros, wings and raptor feet. This game is showing progress indeed.
TheLastProject
 
Posts: 432
Joined: 06 Nov 2011, 17:04

Re: What do we want in RE?

Postby Ulukai » 29 Feb 2012, 21:39

And don't forget: when you launch the game for the first time, it auto-detects the best settings. Bad PC equals low settings.
User avatar
Ulukai
 
Posts: 741
Joined: 19 Mar 2011, 10:55
Location: Mechelen, Belgium

Re: What do we want in RE?

Postby TheLastProject » 29 Feb 2012, 21:49

Ulukai {l Wrote}:And don't forget: when you launch the game for the first time, it auto-detects the best settings. Bad PC equals low settings.

It does?
Hats, Afros, wings and raptor feet. This game is showing progress indeed.
TheLastProject
 
Posts: 432
Joined: 06 Nov 2011, 17:04

Re: What do we want in RE?

Postby 012yArthur0 » 01 Mar 2012, 01:10

Nope. I had to fix the settings manually.
012yArthur0
 
Posts: 14
Joined: 03 Feb 2012, 02:27

Re: What do we want in RE?

Postby Ulukai » 01 Mar 2012, 08:24

TheLastProject {l Wrote}:
Ulukai {l Wrote}:And don't forget: when you launch the game for the first time, it auto-detects the best settings. Bad PC equals low settings.

It does?

Hmm... I thought I had read this somewhere but have a hard time finding it. I'll probably be mistaken, but when I launched the game for the first time on my game PC and on my laptop with crappy intel GFX the settings were different I think. It may partly be because the hardware capabilities but imo sometimes the red or orange options were not enabled by default however I could choose them if I wanted to.
User avatar
Ulukai
 
Posts: 741
Joined: 19 Mar 2011, 10:55
Location: Mechelen, Belgium

Re: What do we want in RE?

Postby qreeves » 01 Mar 2012, 08:40

Certain settings which aren't supported by your hardware are turned off, but it makes no attempt to "tune" other settings to your hardware requirements. Other than this, the only other thing the engine grabs is your desktop resolution in an effort to determine a sane starting resolution on first boot.
Quinton "quin" Reeves | Lead Developer, Red Eclipse | http://redeclipse.net/ | http://www.facebook.com/redeclipse.net
User avatar
qreeves
 
Posts: 1294
Joined: 17 Mar 2011, 03:46
Location: Queensland, Australia

Re: What do we want in RE?

Postby TheLastProject » 01 Mar 2012, 13:35

qreeves {l Wrote}:Certain settings which aren't supported by your hardware are turned off, but it makes no attempt to "tune" other settings to your hardware requirements. Other than this, the only other thing the engine grabs is your desktop resolution in an effort to determine a sane starting resolution on first boot.

Good to know. Thanks for the info quin.
Hats, Afros, wings and raptor feet. This game is showing progress indeed.
TheLastProject
 
Posts: 432
Joined: 06 Nov 2011, 17:04

Re: What do we want in RE?

Postby GooshGoosh! » 01 Mar 2012, 20:23

Vaecrius {l Wrote}:As someone whose computer can easily run all that without a hitch, I would rather that we didn't have all that gimmicky crap (besides destructible environments!) before we had a good reason to include it - a game never, ever looks better with better tech but not better art.

Some of the stuff here (e.g., rim-lighting) is useful now because it is directly connected to gameplay, but HDR and motion blur are not only useless but hurt the fast, dance-and-duel fighting style of RE gameplay - make opponents too hard to see and your instagib matches turn into a "realistic" cat-and-mouse.


At least you liked the destructible environments idea, but for that, we need rim shadows, the rest isn't mandatory.
User avatar
GooshGoosh!
 
Posts: 49
Joined: 30 Jul 2011, 16:01

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest