You'll play communist propaganda aimed at children (SuperTuxKart)
communism is completely incompatible with capitalism, while free SW is not
I am an anarchist.
They are promoting good and art can (or actually has to and is supposed to) be biased and subjective.
One idea is to have a Half-Life 1 single-player FPS, which we desperately need in the libre world, where the plot twist, instead of a physics experiment gone wrong, would be a disaster caused by proprietary SW.
Another one is a Pokémon-style game which would take place in an anarchistic society, showing it is a consistent model of a good society (when you think about it, the world of original Pokémon already had a lot of attributes of it).
Feel free to steal these ideas, I highly encourage creation of such games.
But on the note of anarchist Paradise gone wrong; Ursula le Guin's "The Dispossessed" is highly recommended:
We need another movement to combat proprietary software and Open Source. I'm thinking "User Respecting Software". It doesn't have the word "free" in it. It gets straight to the point. This software will not do you harm intentionally. This means proper license and no anti-features.
I can understand your frustration with the movement, but I can not understand why you want to abandon the principles. This sounds like surrender. So what do you want? Should we all just surrender the ground to the proprietary world and let copyright destroy us? This clearly doesn't sound right to me. Things don't look bright these days, but if the free software movement didn't exist, things would be just much worse now.
I also understand your complaint that there is now a lot of software that is “technically free software / open source” but abusive in a different way.
Julius {l Wrote}:Moderator notice: I deleted the last three comments because we really don't need discussions with rape analogies and worse on this forum. Consider your self warned
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest