Danimal {l Wrote}:KeeperFX is more of an ultimate fix and expansion pack, they hacked the original code to fix everything needed, but having into account its a pretty old game and they are not making money or hurting sales since the original game files are needed they should be pretty safe law-wise
Danimal {l Wrote}:you are wrong, shutting down keeperFX would go agaisnt EA interest, the reason is that they are boosting sales of an obsolete game, just like in japan doujinshi (its wrotten like that?) are considered good because they boosts sales of the original product.
Also, its seems the age of tower defense games is over, the current trend is idle games and a comeback of arcades and rpg´s
Danimal {l Wrote}:you just showed you have no idea of what you are talking...
Danimal {l Wrote}:The new dungeon keeper is a fremium abomination and insult to all lovers of the original game, it will never compete against anything.
Danimal {l Wrote}:Also there are plenty of AAA DK remakes this year that follows it spirit like war for the overworld or Dungeons 2. You see big companies are not interested in taking down some ragtag dev team that resurrect an old game for free, they will only when they fear someone is succefully using their license/assests with a good chance to make money
Danimal {l Wrote}:You are indeed a pretty negative person, fremium migth work economically but its a bad practice for consumers and players, its a matter of time before it dies just like EA DLC tactics. Inxile is a good example of a company doing things rigth, not to mention the indie market taking bites at the big companies.
Danimal {l Wrote}:Also EA cant take down those other projects just because there have some alike mechanics, as long as they dont use any of it properties/licenses. Its like running a tire company and trying to sue another tire company because their tires are also round.
Danimal {l Wrote}:Can you see the reason of being really anal with licenses of OGA? because if you ever make something good that can sell and you use licensed art you get shot down inmediatly or worse, sued.
Evropi {l Wrote}:It was the artists' choice to license it like that. So no, it's not 'stealing', it was the intended effect of licensing as CC and it was their decision. To publish it elsewhere is not a disrespect to them and it's perfectly legal.
Evropi {l Wrote}:In general, as an economics student, I find a lot of your opinions extremely ignorant and basic. You should probably stick to programming.
Danimal {l Wrote}:So you say that avoiding including less than clear art
Danimal {l Wrote}:keeping legality to avoid being sued and being really mindful of artist whises is a bad thing?
Danimal {l Wrote}:but stealing art
Danimal {l Wrote}:disobeying artist desires
Danimal {l Wrote}:making available non free license art misleading people into thinking its safe for use is good?
Danimal {l Wrote}:Your priorities are all messed up, i just hope noone has to suffer because of you and your anti-OGA site.
Danimal {l Wrote}:Dont you have your own "common sense" and opinions? you need to follow the current of the internet?
Danimal {l Wrote}:And also, YES, Artists are fucking military commanders in everything concerning their works, they can decide every fucking aspect of what to do with their art
Danimal {l Wrote}:if an artist retires their works from public use and you disobey it, they can perfectly sue you for copyrigth infringement
Danimal {l Wrote}:you are not making it far into this open-game world if you alreday are betraying your best allies.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest