I can't help but notice that you still have the entry in your FAQ that claims to prohibit "use of this music in any project considered to be pornographic in nature" even though many people have informed you that this contradicts your licence choice. I am not a lawyer but it seems to me that there are two ways of interpreting what you are doing:
1) The prohibition is acting as an ammendement to the license. You can use whatever license you want but according to the creative commons website if you make changes then:
"you must no longer call, label, or describe the license as a “Creative Commons” or “CC” license, nor can you use the Creative Commons logos, buttons, or other trademarks in connection with the modified license or your materials. ..."
See
https://wiki.creativecommons.org/FAQ#Ca ... ditions.3F . They may have grounds to ask you to remove their trademark from your site.
2) The second possibility is that the license takes precidence and your prohibition is not enforeable. In this case you are misleading users about thier rights. If this really matters a lot to you then you could reword it as a simple request "I would apprecaite it if..." but I think it would be better if you removed the prohibition completely. You shouldn't assume that the only people who would care about this are pornographers. Many people believe that releasing content with moral restrictions is a slippery slope with many unintended consequences.
Regards,
Niels