qubodup {l Wrote}:Does anybody else dislike the use of real-life open source logos as decoration in open source games?
(at least when they are 100% identical to the actual logo in shape, like for example ubuntu seems to be.
+1
qubodup {l Wrote}:Does anybody else dislike the use of real-life open source logos as decoration in open source games?
(at least when they are 100% identical to the actual logo in shape, like for example ubuntu seems to be.
what license are you releasing this under?
Does anybody else dislike the use of real-life open source logos as decoration in open source games?
(at least when they are 100% identical to the actual logo in shape, like for example ubuntu seems to be.
ctdabomb {l Wrote}:
errr..... thats not compatible with GPL maybe you should release this under one of the CC licenses? (http://creativecommons.org/)
ctdabomb {l Wrote}:
errr..... thats not compatible with GPL maybe you should release this under one of the CC licenses? (http://creativecommons.org/)
errr..... thats not compatible with GPL
As long as it's listed as a Free Software license in here
Arthur {l Wrote}:As long as it's listed as a Free Software license in here: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-li ... erLicenses and the requirements of the specific license is met, I think we are safe to use it. And this license is.
ctdabomb {l Wrote}:where is the picture on the right?
ctdabomb {l Wrote}:here is another version with the bugs jymis pointed out, and added some trees like in the screenshot kolado posted a long time ago
jymis {l Wrote}:HERE.....
Ludsky {l Wrote}:Good, You Work on my idea ?
qubodup {l Wrote}:I like the texture of 3 and think that the lightness of 1 is the best.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest